I’ve spoken a little bit about Tripolit, the project on which I’m working in this space. As of now, I’ve talked about to what it’s vaguely related and some problems/ideas I have about the so-called online social networking industry.
So let’s talk about it some more. What is it? In a product paper I submitted for the WFU Chambers Grant, I say that:
Tripolit aspires to become the Google of political information. Google strives to “organize the world’s information
and make it universally accessible and useful.” Tripolit, in turn, aims to be the best one-source solution for the
discovery of political people and political intelligence.
For me, the political industry faces two problems:
The political marketplace sees an incredibly high rate of turnover. Practically every two years we see places like Washington, D.C. change drastically. Moreover, creating, maintaining and establishing new relationships is a must for any politically-motivated individual.
Knowledge is power. And there is a heck of a lot of information through which to wade to make effective decisions. The issue today isn’t the availability of information — it’s the ability to pick out the most relevant pieces.
Seeing this, I wondered why there wasn’t a better way not only to network, but to stay aware of how your contacts were linked to actual happenings. Yes, word of mouth keeps people up to date, but there’s got to be a better way. Why not make a concerted effort to bridge the gap between news stories, blogs, podcasts, journals, etc. — that is, who wrote it? who worked on it? who’s in it?
I’ve made a lot of progress. Now more than just a formulated concept, I’m beginning to generate some material results.
More later.